Book a demo

Cited answers for every member.
Only from what they’re entitled to.

One assistant for your whole library. Access is checked before the answer is written.

30 minutes, on your own documents.

Maren HoltProcess safety engineer
Corporate
Luis ArcePlant operations supervisor
Member
Jordan PikeEngineering student
Public
What were the root causes of the Texas City explosion?asked by all three
Maren HoltCorporate

The CSB traced the March 2005 explosion, 15 killed and 180 injured 1, to failures at three levels:

Board
The Group Board “did not provide effective oversight” of safety culture 2
Site
No reporting and learning culture; procedures were not enforced 2
Unit
No flare on the blowdown system; no automated high-level controls 3
CSB report page 210, root causes, with the cited sentence highlighted
2 · p.210
CSB 2005-04-I-TX p.17p.210p.211
3 tiers searched · 3 pages citedCited
Luis ArceMember

The CSB traced the March 2005 explosion, 15 killed and 180 injured 1, to failures at three levels:

Board
The Group Board “did not provide effective oversight” of safety culture 2
Site
No reporting and learning culture; procedures were not enforced 2
Unit
No flare on the blowdown system; no automated high-level controls 3
CSB report page 210, root causes, with the cited sentence highlighted
2 · p.210
CSB 2005-04-I-TX p.17p.210p.211
2 tiers searched · 3 pages citedCited
Jordan PikePublic
Not in your accessThe CSB final reports are Member content.
Request access

From the public recordThe CSB investigated the March 23, 2005 explosion at BP Texas City: 15 killed, 180 injured. Its root-cause findings sit in the final report.

Member content · p.210
1 tier searched · 0 report pages cited
What’s the difference between RMP Program 1, 2 and 3?asked by all three
Maren HoltCorporate

The level depends on offsite impact and on whether OSHA PSM covers the process:

Program 1
No offsite harm in five years, worst case short of the public, coordinated response 1
Program 2
Anything that is neither Program 1 nor Program 3 2
Program 3
Not Program 1, and in listed NAICS codes or subject to OSHA PSM 3
40 CFR 68 p.16668.10(g) (h) (i)
3 tiers searched · 1 page citedCited
Luis ArceMember
Not in your access40 CFR Part 68 is Corporate content.
Request access

From the public recordEPA’s Risk Management Program covers specifically listed chemicals, and covered facilities file a risk management plan. The program levels are defined in 40 CFR Part 68.

Corporate content · p.166
2 tiers searched · 0 pages cited
Jordan PikePublic
Not in your access40 CFR Part 68 is Corporate content.
Request access

From the public recordEPA’s Risk Management Program covers specifically listed chemicals, and covered facilities file a risk management plan. The program levels are defined in 40 CFR Part 68.

Corporate content · p.166
1 tier searched · 0 pages cited
Examples are built on public documents; access tiers are simulated.PublicMemberCorporate

Demos built on public guidance from

  • OSHA
  • CSB
  • EPA
  • FEMA
  • FHWA
  • FAA
  • CDC
  • AHRQ
  • IRS
  • FFIEC

Pick a member. The rings decide what the answer can quote.

Your library as Chairlift sees it: documents sit in the tier that opens them. Locked rings never reach the answer.

Ask the Texas City question as

Luis Arce can search: 29 CFR 1910.119, OSHA 3132, CSB · Texas City, CSB · T2, CSB · West, CSB · PES. Locked: 40 CFR Part 68, EPA RMP guidance.

Luis ArceStrong match

The CSB traced the March 2005 explosion, 15 killed and 180 injured 1, to failures at three levels:

Board
The Group Board “did not provide effective oversight” of safety culture 2
Site
No reporting and learning culture; procedures were not enforced 2
Unit
No flare on the blowdown system; no automated high-level controls 3
CSB 2005-04-I-TX p.17p.210p.211
p.210CSB · Texas CityMember ring · open to Luis
2 tiers searched · 3 pages cited · Part 68 never opened
Asked as Luis Arce, Member. Cited answer from CSB · Texas City, p.210. 2 tiers searched · 3 pages cited · Part 68 never opened.

Access is checked before the answer is written

Locked documents never reach the answer, so nothing locked can leak into it.

Tiers

Each person searches only what their grants open.

Luis ArceMember
2 of 3 tiers
  • OSHA PSM29 CFR 1910.119 · OSHA 3132Searched
  • CSB final reportsTexas City · T2 · West · PESSearched
  • EPA Part 6840 CFR 68 · RMP guidanceLocked

Citations

Every claim points to a page, and the page opens beside it.

1Management of ChangeOSHA 3132 · p.22
OSHA 3132 page 22, Management of Change, with the five considerations highlighted

Honest refusals

No invented limits, doses or torque values.

“What’s the safe operating limit for our reactor R-101?”

“I can only answer from the Process Safety Library materials, and they don’t cover that.”

3tiers searched
P-02plant-specific value
0numbers made

Your rules

Warnings you write, attached where they apply.

Incident lessons, not a site assessmentCheck storage against your PHA and local fire code.
W-03
WHEN topic is ammonium nitrate storageTHEN attach notice W-03

It does more. Safely.

Requests become drafted actions, and members’ own AI tools get the same rings.

Drafts the request. A person approves it.

Dry run first. Nothing is written until Tomasz Brandt says yes.

  1. Requested
  2. Dry run
  3. Approving
  4. Approved
  5. Record
moc.open_reviewHarrow Bend MOC registerMOC-2026-0142
titleNew relief valve PSV-3107 on drum D-310
technical_basisRelief load for revised feed rate(l)(2)(i)
safety_health_impactRevalidate PHA node 4(l)(2)(ii)
procedure_changesSOP-D310-02, revision C(l)(2)(iii)
time_periodPermanent(l)(2)(iv)
authorizationTomasz Brandt, PSM manager(l)(2)(v)
5 of 5 MOC considerations

Inside members’ own AI tools. Paywall intact.

Every MCP call runs as the token’s owner, with their grants.

Desktop AI assistantsearch_knowledge(“When is a pre-startup safety review required?”)
Maren Holtmcp_••••71
3 passages, cited1910.119(i) · OSHA 3132 p.18
Desktop AI assistantsearch_knowledge(“What does RMP Program 3 require?”)
Luis Arcemcp_••••19
Nothing from Part 68Access note: Corporate content

Read-only · audit on every call

Every unanswered question comes back as a fix.

Gaps are logged, fixed, turned into test questions, and a release waits until every one passes.

Release v1443/43test questions pass
  1. Gap spottedHydrogen storage · 19 questions, no source
  2. Fix the content29 CFR 1910.103 added
  3. Becomes a testExpects 1910.103(b)
  4. Release gateHeld at 42/43, then live
  5. Next weekHydrogen now cites 1910.103(b)

Five libraries. One platform.

30 minutes, on your own documents.

We map your tiers to rings and ask one question as three of your members.